Not sure where to start? Ask Mulligan
Tyler Ferrell is the only person in the world named to Golf Digest's list of Best
Young Teachers in
America AND its list of Best Golf Fitness Professionals in America.
Understanding the Flat Spot for Better Driver Consistency
After this video, you'll be able to:
- Identify the optimal club height at impact for improved accuracy
- Understand the relationship between body movement and club path
- Differentiate between effective and ineffective driving techniques
In this analysis video, discover how the flat spot in your swing affects your driving performance. Learn to observe club height relative to the ball for more consistent strikes.
Video Transcript
WEBVTT
1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:04.640
In this analysis video, we're going to focus on one aspect of the club path and
2
00:00:04.640 --> 00:00:06.920
how it relates to driving performance.
3
00:00:06.920 --> 00:00:10.750
So we're going to take a look at the flat spot, or basically we're going to
4
00:00:10.750 --> 00:00:13.520
look at the club height to the ground.
5
00:00:13.520 --> 00:00:18.560
So on the screen I've got two of the top drivers in the game right now, Dustin
6
00:00:18.560 --> 00:00:20.720
Johnson on the left, Brooks Kepko on the right.
7
00:00:20.720 --> 00:00:25.280
But my goal is to quickly look through a number of the top drivers as well as
8
00:00:25.280 --> 00:00:29.800
some of the poorer drivers so that you can recognize the pattern.
9
00:00:29.800 --> 00:00:34.050
And what we're going to do is we're just going to look at roughly the foot
10
00:00:34.050 --> 00:00:36.600
before impact and the foot after impact.
11
00:00:36.600 --> 00:00:41.400
And I just want to observe the club height compared to the golf ball.
12
00:00:41.400 --> 00:00:45.600
What you're going to see is that the more consistent drivers of the golf ball
13
00:00:45.600 --> 00:00:50.740
tend to have the club height at about the same height as the golf ball for a
14
00:00:50.740 --> 00:00:52.600
longer period of time.
15
00:00:52.600 --> 00:00:57.850
So here you can see by about the right foot, Dustin has the club height close
16
00:00:57.850 --> 00:01:03.810
to the height of the golf ball, and then they're good, three, four inches after
17
00:01:03.810 --> 00:01:04.600
impact.
18
00:01:04.600 --> 00:01:06.600
It's still at about the same height.
19
00:01:06.600 --> 00:01:11.280
So he's by using his body as his main power source, his hips and his core as
20
00:01:11.280 --> 00:01:15.200
his main power source that delays the timing of the arms.
21
00:01:15.200 --> 00:01:20.870
So then when the arms extend, he's in this rotated and side bent position so
22
00:01:20.870 --> 00:01:26.290
that when his arms extend, that keeps the club at a more consistent height down
23
00:01:26.290 --> 00:01:27.200
at the bottom.
24
00:01:27.200 --> 00:01:31.240
As opposed to if you were to swing more with your arms and have a little bit
25
00:01:31.240 --> 00:01:33.200
more of a high to low pattern.
26
00:01:33.200 --> 00:01:37.010
So now over on the right, if we look at Brooks, we can see the club height is a
27
00:01:37.010 --> 00:01:40.650
little higher compared to the ground because he has the ball teed up a bit
28
00:01:40.650 --> 00:01:41.200
higher.
29
00:01:41.200 --> 00:01:45.390
But roughly from about that right foot, you can see the club is close to the
30
00:01:45.390 --> 00:01:49.770
height of the golf ball, close to the height of the golf ball, close to the
31
00:01:49.770 --> 00:01:51.200
height of the golf ball.
32
00:01:51.200 --> 00:01:56.200
And you'll see that he does it for a fairly long period of time.
33
00:01:56.200 --> 00:02:01.780
So even though he hits down on the golf ball, you'll see that he demonstrates
34
00:02:01.780 --> 00:02:07.200
this pattern of having a flatter path of the club down through impact.
35
00:02:07.200 --> 00:02:13.570
And it's one of my beliefs that this pattern helps with overall driving
36
00:02:13.570 --> 00:02:15.200
consistency.
37
00:02:15.200 --> 00:02:19.840
Okay, I don't want you to think it's just a trait of really tall guys. Here we
38
00:02:19.840 --> 00:02:24.200
have Justin Thomas and Jim Furek, couple different swing styles.
39
00:02:24.200 --> 00:02:29.650
Again, Justin Thomas who hits well up on the ball, you can see that he's got
40
00:02:29.650 --> 00:02:35.890
the height of the driver close to the height of the golf ball, well behind the
41
00:02:35.890 --> 00:02:40.200
golf ball, actually over a foot or so behind the golf ball.
42
00:02:40.200 --> 00:02:44.700
And he's done so because he's brought the club down there primarily with his
43
00:02:44.700 --> 00:02:51.200
body, and then his arms extending create a pretty long flat spot of the club.
44
00:02:51.200 --> 00:02:55.760
Here we have Jim Furek. The club is a little bit higher coming into the golf
45
00:02:55.760 --> 00:03:00.130
ball. He doesn't get it down quite as early, but you'll see that he does a
46
00:03:00.130 --> 00:03:03.200
really job of keeping it down pretty late.
47
00:03:03.200 --> 00:03:11.310
So he creates more of a flat pattern from right about there through there. Now
48
00:03:11.310 --> 00:03:14.780
it's going to have some arc to it, but we're just recognizing this general
49
00:03:14.780 --> 00:03:18.960
trend of having the club low to the golf ball beforehand and low to the golf
50
00:03:18.960 --> 00:03:21.200
ball afterward.
51
00:03:21.200 --> 00:03:25.710
So here we have two more examples of top drivers in the game, Francesco Molin
52
00:03:25.710 --> 00:03:31.300
ari and Justin Rose over on the right. Here you can see club height low to the
53
00:03:31.300 --> 00:03:36.200
ground, low to the ground, low to the ground, low for a long period of time.
54
00:03:36.200 --> 00:03:41.580
Roughly, I give my students the goal of from about the right foot through just
55
00:03:41.580 --> 00:03:45.790
past the left foot. Then over here on the right, we have Justin Rose so right
56
00:03:45.790 --> 00:03:48.200
about there, close to even with the right foot.
57
00:03:48.200 --> 00:03:54.040
It's a touch higher, but still within kind of the perimeter of the ball stays
58
00:03:54.040 --> 00:03:58.200
pretty low and flat until just past that left foot.
59
00:03:58.200 --> 00:04:02.610
So there's by having proper sequencing, empowering the swing more with your
60
00:04:02.610 --> 00:04:07.200
hips and lower body, whether you're hitting slightly up or slightly down.
61
00:04:07.200 --> 00:04:12.980
I don't think that has as big an influence as to the rate of change or what I
62
00:04:12.980 --> 00:04:17.200
look at as this flat spot from the face on camera.
63
00:04:17.200 --> 00:04:22.060
Now before we look at some pros who tend to perform works, let's take a quick
64
00:04:22.060 --> 00:04:26.810
look at an amateur and this is more consistent of what I see. This is a low
65
00:04:26.810 --> 00:04:30.040
single digit handicapper and you'll see that the club height is above the
66
00:04:30.040 --> 00:04:31.200
height of the golf ball.
67
00:04:31.200 --> 00:04:36.780
It's just getting down into the height of the golf ball stays down for a slight
68
00:04:36.780 --> 00:04:41.200
period of time and then starts to come up fairly quickly.
69
00:04:41.200 --> 00:04:45.900
So while it might be low for a period quite like that, it's nowhere near as
70
00:04:45.900 --> 00:04:50.680
long a flat spot as what we saw some of the more elite drivers of the golf ball
71
00:04:50.680 --> 00:04:52.200
demonstrating.
72
00:04:52.200 --> 00:04:56.320
So now we'll briefly look at a few of the worst ranked drivers on the tour
73
00:04:56.320 --> 00:05:00.200
right now. So this is Smiley Kaufman over on the right.
74
00:05:00.200 --> 00:05:05.570
We've got Cameron turn golly over here on the left. You'll see if we get to
75
00:05:05.570 --> 00:05:10.720
right about when the club is even with the height of the foot, you'll see that
76
00:05:10.720 --> 00:05:13.200
the bottom of the club is still higher than the height of the golf ball.
77
00:05:13.200 --> 00:05:18.190
He does get it down, but you'll see that it starts to come up pretty quickly
78
00:05:18.190 --> 00:05:23.170
compared to some of those more elite drivers who we saw in the first part of
79
00:05:23.170 --> 00:05:24.200
the video.
80
00:05:24.200 --> 00:05:30.050
As you can imagine, it's a little harder to find a really high quality video of
81
00:05:30.050 --> 00:05:38.080
the guys who tend to struggle a bit more, but here you can see just after the
82
00:05:38.080 --> 00:05:41.200
club is above the height of the golf ball.
83
00:05:41.200 --> 00:05:46.920
And then that frame, I wish we had the frame kind of even with the foot, but
84
00:05:46.920 --> 00:05:52.440
you can see that it's coming from a much more kind of almost V shape high to
85
00:05:52.440 --> 00:05:58.200
high pattern as opposed to more of that gradual changing flat to flat.
86
00:05:58.200 --> 00:06:04.120
One last example, I've got Phil Mickelson here, known for being a less accurate
87
00:06:04.120 --> 00:06:08.990
driver of the golf ball. I know everyone loves to talk about his club face
88
00:06:08.990 --> 00:06:11.200
control and the steep transition.
89
00:06:11.200 --> 00:06:15.010
I think part of that is what it does down here at the bottom. So you'll see I
90
00:06:15.010 --> 00:06:19.800
've got him flipped around to a right handed pattern. You can see club height is
91
00:06:19.800 --> 00:06:25.380
still at this point, so roughly even with the foot, the bottom of the club is
92
00:06:25.380 --> 00:06:27.200
still just above the top of the ball.
93
00:06:27.200 --> 00:06:32.020
Comes down, looks pretty good through there, but then it comes up very quickly
94
00:06:32.020 --> 00:06:36.950
before it gets to the other foot. So while there's still a flatish spot and
95
00:06:36.950 --> 00:06:41.200
when his timing is on, he's a great driver of the golf ball.
96
00:06:41.200 --> 00:06:47.520
His overall consistency puts him towards the bottom statistically in accuracy
97
00:06:47.520 --> 00:06:49.200
and performance.
98
00:06:49.200 --> 00:06:54.310
So if you're struggling with your driver, this is one of the first places I
99
00:06:54.310 --> 00:06:59.250
might look to just get the overall shape of the path of the club down at the
100
00:06:59.250 --> 00:07:00.200
bottom.
101
00:07:00.200 --> 00:07:06.690
And if you find that it has much more of a V shape or high to high pattern to
102
00:07:06.690 --> 00:07:10.350
it, that might be something you want to try to work on to improve your driving
103
00:07:10.350 --> 00:07:11.200
consistency.
1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:04.640
In this analysis video, we're going to focus on one aspect of the club path and
2
00:00:04.640 --> 00:00:06.920
how it relates to driving performance.
3
00:00:06.920 --> 00:00:10.750
So we're going to take a look at the flat spot, or basically we're going to
4
00:00:10.750 --> 00:00:13.520
look at the club height to the ground.
5
00:00:13.520 --> 00:00:18.560
So on the screen I've got two of the top drivers in the game right now, Dustin
6
00:00:18.560 --> 00:00:20.720
Johnson on the left, Brooks Kepko on the right.
7
00:00:20.720 --> 00:00:25.280
But my goal is to quickly look through a number of the top drivers as well as
8
00:00:25.280 --> 00:00:29.800
some of the poorer drivers so that you can recognize the pattern.
9
00:00:29.800 --> 00:00:34.050
And what we're going to do is we're just going to look at roughly the foot
10
00:00:34.050 --> 00:00:36.600
before impact and the foot after impact.
11
00:00:36.600 --> 00:00:41.400
And I just want to observe the club height compared to the golf ball.
12
00:00:41.400 --> 00:00:45.600
What you're going to see is that the more consistent drivers of the golf ball
13
00:00:45.600 --> 00:00:50.740
tend to have the club height at about the same height as the golf ball for a
14
00:00:50.740 --> 00:00:52.600
longer period of time.
15
00:00:52.600 --> 00:00:57.850
So here you can see by about the right foot, Dustin has the club height close
16
00:00:57.850 --> 00:01:03.810
to the height of the golf ball, and then they're good, three, four inches after
17
00:01:03.810 --> 00:01:04.600
impact.
18
00:01:04.600 --> 00:01:06.600
It's still at about the same height.
19
00:01:06.600 --> 00:01:11.280
So he's by using his body as his main power source, his hips and his core as
20
00:01:11.280 --> 00:01:15.200
his main power source that delays the timing of the arms.
21
00:01:15.200 --> 00:01:20.870
So then when the arms extend, he's in this rotated and side bent position so
22
00:01:20.870 --> 00:01:26.290
that when his arms extend, that keeps the club at a more consistent height down
23
00:01:26.290 --> 00:01:27.200
at the bottom.
24
00:01:27.200 --> 00:01:31.240
As opposed to if you were to swing more with your arms and have a little bit
25
00:01:31.240 --> 00:01:33.200
more of a high to low pattern.
26
00:01:33.200 --> 00:01:37.010
So now over on the right, if we look at Brooks, we can see the club height is a
27
00:01:37.010 --> 00:01:40.650
little higher compared to the ground because he has the ball teed up a bit
28
00:01:40.650 --> 00:01:41.200
higher.
29
00:01:41.200 --> 00:01:45.390
But roughly from about that right foot, you can see the club is close to the
30
00:01:45.390 --> 00:01:49.770
height of the golf ball, close to the height of the golf ball, close to the
31
00:01:49.770 --> 00:01:51.200
height of the golf ball.
32
00:01:51.200 --> 00:01:56.200
And you'll see that he does it for a fairly long period of time.
33
00:01:56.200 --> 00:02:01.780
So even though he hits down on the golf ball, you'll see that he demonstrates
34
00:02:01.780 --> 00:02:07.200
this pattern of having a flatter path of the club down through impact.
35
00:02:07.200 --> 00:02:13.570
And it's one of my beliefs that this pattern helps with overall driving
36
00:02:13.570 --> 00:02:15.200
consistency.
37
00:02:15.200 --> 00:02:19.840
Okay, I don't want you to think it's just a trait of really tall guys. Here we
38
00:02:19.840 --> 00:02:24.200
have Justin Thomas and Jim Furek, couple different swing styles.
39
00:02:24.200 --> 00:02:29.650
Again, Justin Thomas who hits well up on the ball, you can see that he's got
40
00:02:29.650 --> 00:02:35.890
the height of the driver close to the height of the golf ball, well behind the
41
00:02:35.890 --> 00:02:40.200
golf ball, actually over a foot or so behind the golf ball.
42
00:02:40.200 --> 00:02:44.700
And he's done so because he's brought the club down there primarily with his
43
00:02:44.700 --> 00:02:51.200
body, and then his arms extending create a pretty long flat spot of the club.
44
00:02:51.200 --> 00:02:55.760
Here we have Jim Furek. The club is a little bit higher coming into the golf
45
00:02:55.760 --> 00:03:00.130
ball. He doesn't get it down quite as early, but you'll see that he does a
46
00:03:00.130 --> 00:03:03.200
really job of keeping it down pretty late.
47
00:03:03.200 --> 00:03:11.310
So he creates more of a flat pattern from right about there through there. Now
48
00:03:11.310 --> 00:03:14.780
it's going to have some arc to it, but we're just recognizing this general
49
00:03:14.780 --> 00:03:18.960
trend of having the club low to the golf ball beforehand and low to the golf
50
00:03:18.960 --> 00:03:21.200
ball afterward.
51
00:03:21.200 --> 00:03:25.710
So here we have two more examples of top drivers in the game, Francesco Molin
52
00:03:25.710 --> 00:03:31.300
ari and Justin Rose over on the right. Here you can see club height low to the
53
00:03:31.300 --> 00:03:36.200
ground, low to the ground, low to the ground, low for a long period of time.
54
00:03:36.200 --> 00:03:41.580
Roughly, I give my students the goal of from about the right foot through just
55
00:03:41.580 --> 00:03:45.790
past the left foot. Then over here on the right, we have Justin Rose so right
56
00:03:45.790 --> 00:03:48.200
about there, close to even with the right foot.
57
00:03:48.200 --> 00:03:54.040
It's a touch higher, but still within kind of the perimeter of the ball stays
58
00:03:54.040 --> 00:03:58.200
pretty low and flat until just past that left foot.
59
00:03:58.200 --> 00:04:02.610
So there's by having proper sequencing, empowering the swing more with your
60
00:04:02.610 --> 00:04:07.200
hips and lower body, whether you're hitting slightly up or slightly down.
61
00:04:07.200 --> 00:04:12.980
I don't think that has as big an influence as to the rate of change or what I
62
00:04:12.980 --> 00:04:17.200
look at as this flat spot from the face on camera.
63
00:04:17.200 --> 00:04:22.060
Now before we look at some pros who tend to perform works, let's take a quick
64
00:04:22.060 --> 00:04:26.810
look at an amateur and this is more consistent of what I see. This is a low
65
00:04:26.810 --> 00:04:30.040
single digit handicapper and you'll see that the club height is above the
66
00:04:30.040 --> 00:04:31.200
height of the golf ball.
67
00:04:31.200 --> 00:04:36.780
It's just getting down into the height of the golf ball stays down for a slight
68
00:04:36.780 --> 00:04:41.200
period of time and then starts to come up fairly quickly.
69
00:04:41.200 --> 00:04:45.900
So while it might be low for a period quite like that, it's nowhere near as
70
00:04:45.900 --> 00:04:50.680
long a flat spot as what we saw some of the more elite drivers of the golf ball
71
00:04:50.680 --> 00:04:52.200
demonstrating.
72
00:04:52.200 --> 00:04:56.320
So now we'll briefly look at a few of the worst ranked drivers on the tour
73
00:04:56.320 --> 00:05:00.200
right now. So this is Smiley Kaufman over on the right.
74
00:05:00.200 --> 00:05:05.570
We've got Cameron turn golly over here on the left. You'll see if we get to
75
00:05:05.570 --> 00:05:10.720
right about when the club is even with the height of the foot, you'll see that
76
00:05:10.720 --> 00:05:13.200
the bottom of the club is still higher than the height of the golf ball.
77
00:05:13.200 --> 00:05:18.190
He does get it down, but you'll see that it starts to come up pretty quickly
78
00:05:18.190 --> 00:05:23.170
compared to some of those more elite drivers who we saw in the first part of
79
00:05:23.170 --> 00:05:24.200
the video.
80
00:05:24.200 --> 00:05:30.050
As you can imagine, it's a little harder to find a really high quality video of
81
00:05:30.050 --> 00:05:38.080
the guys who tend to struggle a bit more, but here you can see just after the
82
00:05:38.080 --> 00:05:41.200
club is above the height of the golf ball.
83
00:05:41.200 --> 00:05:46.920
And then that frame, I wish we had the frame kind of even with the foot, but
84
00:05:46.920 --> 00:05:52.440
you can see that it's coming from a much more kind of almost V shape high to
85
00:05:52.440 --> 00:05:58.200
high pattern as opposed to more of that gradual changing flat to flat.
86
00:05:58.200 --> 00:06:04.120
One last example, I've got Phil Mickelson here, known for being a less accurate
87
00:06:04.120 --> 00:06:08.990
driver of the golf ball. I know everyone loves to talk about his club face
88
00:06:08.990 --> 00:06:11.200
control and the steep transition.
89
00:06:11.200 --> 00:06:15.010
I think part of that is what it does down here at the bottom. So you'll see I
90
00:06:15.010 --> 00:06:19.800
've got him flipped around to a right handed pattern. You can see club height is
91
00:06:19.800 --> 00:06:25.380
still at this point, so roughly even with the foot, the bottom of the club is
92
00:06:25.380 --> 00:06:27.200
still just above the top of the ball.
93
00:06:27.200 --> 00:06:32.020
Comes down, looks pretty good through there, but then it comes up very quickly
94
00:06:32.020 --> 00:06:36.950
before it gets to the other foot. So while there's still a flatish spot and
95
00:06:36.950 --> 00:06:41.200
when his timing is on, he's a great driver of the golf ball.
96
00:06:41.200 --> 00:06:47.520
His overall consistency puts him towards the bottom statistically in accuracy
97
00:06:47.520 --> 00:06:49.200
and performance.
98
00:06:49.200 --> 00:06:54.310
So if you're struggling with your driver, this is one of the first places I
99
00:06:54.310 --> 00:06:59.250
might look to just get the overall shape of the path of the club down at the
100
00:06:59.250 --> 00:07:00.200
bottom.
101
00:07:00.200 --> 00:07:06.690
And if you find that it has much more of a V shape or high to high pattern to
102
00:07:06.690 --> 00:07:10.350
it, that might be something you want to try to work on to improve your driving
103
00:07:10.350 --> 00:07:11.200
consistency.
Have questions?
Ask Mulligan for help
Tyler Ferrell is the only person in the world named to Golf Digest's list of
Best Young Teachers in America AND its list of Best Golf Fitness Professionals in America.
Understanding the Flat Spot for Better Driver Consistency
After this video, you'll be able to:
- Identify the optimal club height at impact for improved accuracy
- Understand the relationship between body movement and club path
- Differentiate between effective and ineffective driving techniques
In this analysis video, discover how the flat spot in your swing affects your driving performance. Learn to observe club height relative to the ball for more consistent strikes.
Video Transcript
WEBVTT
1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:04.640
In this analysis video, we're going to focus on one aspect of the club path and
2
00:00:04.640 --> 00:00:06.920
how it relates to driving performance.
3
00:00:06.920 --> 00:00:10.750
So we're going to take a look at the flat spot, or basically we're going to
4
00:00:10.750 --> 00:00:13.520
look at the club height to the ground.
5
00:00:13.520 --> 00:00:18.560
So on the screen I've got two of the top drivers in the game right now, Dustin
6
00:00:18.560 --> 00:00:20.720
Johnson on the left, Brooks Kepko on the right.
7
00:00:20.720 --> 00:00:25.280
But my goal is to quickly look through a number of the top drivers as well as
8
00:00:25.280 --> 00:00:29.800
some of the poorer drivers so that you can recognize the pattern.
9
00:00:29.800 --> 00:00:34.050
And what we're going to do is we're just going to look at roughly the foot
10
00:00:34.050 --> 00:00:36.600
before impact and the foot after impact.
11
00:00:36.600 --> 00:00:41.400
And I just want to observe the club height compared to the golf ball.
12
00:00:41.400 --> 00:00:45.600
What you're going to see is that the more consistent drivers of the golf ball
13
00:00:45.600 --> 00:00:50.740
tend to have the club height at about the same height as the golf ball for a
14
00:00:50.740 --> 00:00:52.600
longer period of time.
15
00:00:52.600 --> 00:00:57.850
So here you can see by about the right foot, Dustin has the club height close
16
00:00:57.850 --> 00:01:03.810
to the height of the golf ball, and then they're good, three, four inches after
17
00:01:03.810 --> 00:01:04.600
impact.
18
00:01:04.600 --> 00:01:06.600
It's still at about the same height.
19
00:01:06.600 --> 00:01:11.280
So he's by using his body as his main power source, his hips and his core as
20
00:01:11.280 --> 00:01:15.200
his main power source that delays the timing of the arms.
21
00:01:15.200 --> 00:01:20.870
So then when the arms extend, he's in this rotated and side bent position so
22
00:01:20.870 --> 00:01:26.290
that when his arms extend, that keeps the club at a more consistent height down
23
00:01:26.290 --> 00:01:27.200
at the bottom.
24
00:01:27.200 --> 00:01:31.240
As opposed to if you were to swing more with your arms and have a little bit
25
00:01:31.240 --> 00:01:33.200
more of a high to low pattern.
26
00:01:33.200 --> 00:01:37.010
So now over on the right, if we look at Brooks, we can see the club height is a
27
00:01:37.010 --> 00:01:40.650
little higher compared to the ground because he has the ball teed up a bit
28
00:01:40.650 --> 00:01:41.200
higher.
29
00:01:41.200 --> 00:01:45.390
But roughly from about that right foot, you can see the club is close to the
30
00:01:45.390 --> 00:01:49.770
height of the golf ball, close to the height of the golf ball, close to the
31
00:01:49.770 --> 00:01:51.200
height of the golf ball.
32
00:01:51.200 --> 00:01:56.200
And you'll see that he does it for a fairly long period of time.
33
00:01:56.200 --> 00:02:01.780
So even though he hits down on the golf ball, you'll see that he demonstrates
34
00:02:01.780 --> 00:02:07.200
this pattern of having a flatter path of the club down through impact.
35
00:02:07.200 --> 00:02:13.570
And it's one of my beliefs that this pattern helps with overall driving
36
00:02:13.570 --> 00:02:15.200
consistency.
37
00:02:15.200 --> 00:02:19.840
Okay, I don't want you to think it's just a trait of really tall guys. Here we
38
00:02:19.840 --> 00:02:24.200
have Justin Thomas and Jim Furek, couple different swing styles.
39
00:02:24.200 --> 00:02:29.650
Again, Justin Thomas who hits well up on the ball, you can see that he's got
40
00:02:29.650 --> 00:02:35.890
the height of the driver close to the height of the golf ball, well behind the
41
00:02:35.890 --> 00:02:40.200
golf ball, actually over a foot or so behind the golf ball.
42
00:02:40.200 --> 00:02:44.700
And he's done so because he's brought the club down there primarily with his
43
00:02:44.700 --> 00:02:51.200
body, and then his arms extending create a pretty long flat spot of the club.
44
00:02:51.200 --> 00:02:55.760
Here we have Jim Furek. The club is a little bit higher coming into the golf
45
00:02:55.760 --> 00:03:00.130
ball. He doesn't get it down quite as early, but you'll see that he does a
46
00:03:00.130 --> 00:03:03.200
really job of keeping it down pretty late.
47
00:03:03.200 --> 00:03:11.310
So he creates more of a flat pattern from right about there through there. Now
48
00:03:11.310 --> 00:03:14.780
it's going to have some arc to it, but we're just recognizing this general
49
00:03:14.780 --> 00:03:18.960
trend of having the club low to the golf ball beforehand and low to the golf
50
00:03:18.960 --> 00:03:21.200
ball afterward.
51
00:03:21.200 --> 00:03:25.710
So here we have two more examples of top drivers in the game, Francesco Molin
52
00:03:25.710 --> 00:03:31.300
ari and Justin Rose over on the right. Here you can see club height low to the
53
00:03:31.300 --> 00:03:36.200
ground, low to the ground, low to the ground, low for a long period of time.
54
00:03:36.200 --> 00:03:41.580
Roughly, I give my students the goal of from about the right foot through just
55
00:03:41.580 --> 00:03:45.790
past the left foot. Then over here on the right, we have Justin Rose so right
56
00:03:45.790 --> 00:03:48.200
about there, close to even with the right foot.
57
00:03:48.200 --> 00:03:54.040
It's a touch higher, but still within kind of the perimeter of the ball stays
58
00:03:54.040 --> 00:03:58.200
pretty low and flat until just past that left foot.
59
00:03:58.200 --> 00:04:02.610
So there's by having proper sequencing, empowering the swing more with your
60
00:04:02.610 --> 00:04:07.200
hips and lower body, whether you're hitting slightly up or slightly down.
61
00:04:07.200 --> 00:04:12.980
I don't think that has as big an influence as to the rate of change or what I
62
00:04:12.980 --> 00:04:17.200
look at as this flat spot from the face on camera.
63
00:04:17.200 --> 00:04:22.060
Now before we look at some pros who tend to perform works, let's take a quick
64
00:04:22.060 --> 00:04:26.810
look at an amateur and this is more consistent of what I see. This is a low
65
00:04:26.810 --> 00:04:30.040
single digit handicapper and you'll see that the club height is above the
66
00:04:30.040 --> 00:04:31.200
height of the golf ball.
67
00:04:31.200 --> 00:04:36.780
It's just getting down into the height of the golf ball stays down for a slight
68
00:04:36.780 --> 00:04:41.200
period of time and then starts to come up fairly quickly.
69
00:04:41.200 --> 00:04:45.900
So while it might be low for a period quite like that, it's nowhere near as
70
00:04:45.900 --> 00:04:50.680
long a flat spot as what we saw some of the more elite drivers of the golf ball
71
00:04:50.680 --> 00:04:52.200
demonstrating.
72
00:04:52.200 --> 00:04:56.320
So now we'll briefly look at a few of the worst ranked drivers on the tour
73
00:04:56.320 --> 00:05:00.200
right now. So this is Smiley Kaufman over on the right.
74
00:05:00.200 --> 00:05:05.570
We've got Cameron turn golly over here on the left. You'll see if we get to
75
00:05:05.570 --> 00:05:10.720
right about when the club is even with the height of the foot, you'll see that
76
00:05:10.720 --> 00:05:13.200
the bottom of the club is still higher than the height of the golf ball.
77
00:05:13.200 --> 00:05:18.190
He does get it down, but you'll see that it starts to come up pretty quickly
78
00:05:18.190 --> 00:05:23.170
compared to some of those more elite drivers who we saw in the first part of
79
00:05:23.170 --> 00:05:24.200
the video.
80
00:05:24.200 --> 00:05:30.050
As you can imagine, it's a little harder to find a really high quality video of
81
00:05:30.050 --> 00:05:38.080
the guys who tend to struggle a bit more, but here you can see just after the
82
00:05:38.080 --> 00:05:41.200
club is above the height of the golf ball.
83
00:05:41.200 --> 00:05:46.920
And then that frame, I wish we had the frame kind of even with the foot, but
84
00:05:46.920 --> 00:05:52.440
you can see that it's coming from a much more kind of almost V shape high to
85
00:05:52.440 --> 00:05:58.200
high pattern as opposed to more of that gradual changing flat to flat.
86
00:05:58.200 --> 00:06:04.120
One last example, I've got Phil Mickelson here, known for being a less accurate
87
00:06:04.120 --> 00:06:08.990
driver of the golf ball. I know everyone loves to talk about his club face
88
00:06:08.990 --> 00:06:11.200
control and the steep transition.
89
00:06:11.200 --> 00:06:15.010
I think part of that is what it does down here at the bottom. So you'll see I
90
00:06:15.010 --> 00:06:19.800
've got him flipped around to a right handed pattern. You can see club height is
91
00:06:19.800 --> 00:06:25.380
still at this point, so roughly even with the foot, the bottom of the club is
92
00:06:25.380 --> 00:06:27.200
still just above the top of the ball.
93
00:06:27.200 --> 00:06:32.020
Comes down, looks pretty good through there, but then it comes up very quickly
94
00:06:32.020 --> 00:06:36.950
before it gets to the other foot. So while there's still a flatish spot and
95
00:06:36.950 --> 00:06:41.200
when his timing is on, he's a great driver of the golf ball.
96
00:06:41.200 --> 00:06:47.520
His overall consistency puts him towards the bottom statistically in accuracy
97
00:06:47.520 --> 00:06:49.200
and performance.
98
00:06:49.200 --> 00:06:54.310
So if you're struggling with your driver, this is one of the first places I
99
00:06:54.310 --> 00:06:59.250
might look to just get the overall shape of the path of the club down at the
100
00:06:59.250 --> 00:07:00.200
bottom.
101
00:07:00.200 --> 00:07:06.690
And if you find that it has much more of a V shape or high to high pattern to
102
00:07:06.690 --> 00:07:10.350
it, that might be something you want to try to work on to improve your driving
103
00:07:10.350 --> 00:07:11.200
consistency.
1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:04.640
In this analysis video, we're going to focus on one aspect of the club path and
2
00:00:04.640 --> 00:00:06.920
how it relates to driving performance.
3
00:00:06.920 --> 00:00:10.750
So we're going to take a look at the flat spot, or basically we're going to
4
00:00:10.750 --> 00:00:13.520
look at the club height to the ground.
5
00:00:13.520 --> 00:00:18.560
So on the screen I've got two of the top drivers in the game right now, Dustin
6
00:00:18.560 --> 00:00:20.720
Johnson on the left, Brooks Kepko on the right.
7
00:00:20.720 --> 00:00:25.280
But my goal is to quickly look through a number of the top drivers as well as
8
00:00:25.280 --> 00:00:29.800
some of the poorer drivers so that you can recognize the pattern.
9
00:00:29.800 --> 00:00:34.050
And what we're going to do is we're just going to look at roughly the foot
10
00:00:34.050 --> 00:00:36.600
before impact and the foot after impact.
11
00:00:36.600 --> 00:00:41.400
And I just want to observe the club height compared to the golf ball.
12
00:00:41.400 --> 00:00:45.600
What you're going to see is that the more consistent drivers of the golf ball
13
00:00:45.600 --> 00:00:50.740
tend to have the club height at about the same height as the golf ball for a
14
00:00:50.740 --> 00:00:52.600
longer period of time.
15
00:00:52.600 --> 00:00:57.850
So here you can see by about the right foot, Dustin has the club height close
16
00:00:57.850 --> 00:01:03.810
to the height of the golf ball, and then they're good, three, four inches after
17
00:01:03.810 --> 00:01:04.600
impact.
18
00:01:04.600 --> 00:01:06.600
It's still at about the same height.
19
00:01:06.600 --> 00:01:11.280
So he's by using his body as his main power source, his hips and his core as
20
00:01:11.280 --> 00:01:15.200
his main power source that delays the timing of the arms.
21
00:01:15.200 --> 00:01:20.870
So then when the arms extend, he's in this rotated and side bent position so
22
00:01:20.870 --> 00:01:26.290
that when his arms extend, that keeps the club at a more consistent height down
23
00:01:26.290 --> 00:01:27.200
at the bottom.
24
00:01:27.200 --> 00:01:31.240
As opposed to if you were to swing more with your arms and have a little bit
25
00:01:31.240 --> 00:01:33.200
more of a high to low pattern.
26
00:01:33.200 --> 00:01:37.010
So now over on the right, if we look at Brooks, we can see the club height is a
27
00:01:37.010 --> 00:01:40.650
little higher compared to the ground because he has the ball teed up a bit
28
00:01:40.650 --> 00:01:41.200
higher.
29
00:01:41.200 --> 00:01:45.390
But roughly from about that right foot, you can see the club is close to the
30
00:01:45.390 --> 00:01:49.770
height of the golf ball, close to the height of the golf ball, close to the
31
00:01:49.770 --> 00:01:51.200
height of the golf ball.
32
00:01:51.200 --> 00:01:56.200
And you'll see that he does it for a fairly long period of time.
33
00:01:56.200 --> 00:02:01.780
So even though he hits down on the golf ball, you'll see that he demonstrates
34
00:02:01.780 --> 00:02:07.200
this pattern of having a flatter path of the club down through impact.
35
00:02:07.200 --> 00:02:13.570
And it's one of my beliefs that this pattern helps with overall driving
36
00:02:13.570 --> 00:02:15.200
consistency.
37
00:02:15.200 --> 00:02:19.840
Okay, I don't want you to think it's just a trait of really tall guys. Here we
38
00:02:19.840 --> 00:02:24.200
have Justin Thomas and Jim Furek, couple different swing styles.
39
00:02:24.200 --> 00:02:29.650
Again, Justin Thomas who hits well up on the ball, you can see that he's got
40
00:02:29.650 --> 00:02:35.890
the height of the driver close to the height of the golf ball, well behind the
41
00:02:35.890 --> 00:02:40.200
golf ball, actually over a foot or so behind the golf ball.
42
00:02:40.200 --> 00:02:44.700
And he's done so because he's brought the club down there primarily with his
43
00:02:44.700 --> 00:02:51.200
body, and then his arms extending create a pretty long flat spot of the club.
44
00:02:51.200 --> 00:02:55.760
Here we have Jim Furek. The club is a little bit higher coming into the golf
45
00:02:55.760 --> 00:03:00.130
ball. He doesn't get it down quite as early, but you'll see that he does a
46
00:03:00.130 --> 00:03:03.200
really job of keeping it down pretty late.
47
00:03:03.200 --> 00:03:11.310
So he creates more of a flat pattern from right about there through there. Now
48
00:03:11.310 --> 00:03:14.780
it's going to have some arc to it, but we're just recognizing this general
49
00:03:14.780 --> 00:03:18.960
trend of having the club low to the golf ball beforehand and low to the golf
50
00:03:18.960 --> 00:03:21.200
ball afterward.
51
00:03:21.200 --> 00:03:25.710
So here we have two more examples of top drivers in the game, Francesco Molin
52
00:03:25.710 --> 00:03:31.300
ari and Justin Rose over on the right. Here you can see club height low to the
53
00:03:31.300 --> 00:03:36.200
ground, low to the ground, low to the ground, low for a long period of time.
54
00:03:36.200 --> 00:03:41.580
Roughly, I give my students the goal of from about the right foot through just
55
00:03:41.580 --> 00:03:45.790
past the left foot. Then over here on the right, we have Justin Rose so right
56
00:03:45.790 --> 00:03:48.200
about there, close to even with the right foot.
57
00:03:48.200 --> 00:03:54.040
It's a touch higher, but still within kind of the perimeter of the ball stays
58
00:03:54.040 --> 00:03:58.200
pretty low and flat until just past that left foot.
59
00:03:58.200 --> 00:04:02.610
So there's by having proper sequencing, empowering the swing more with your
60
00:04:02.610 --> 00:04:07.200
hips and lower body, whether you're hitting slightly up or slightly down.
61
00:04:07.200 --> 00:04:12.980
I don't think that has as big an influence as to the rate of change or what I
62
00:04:12.980 --> 00:04:17.200
look at as this flat spot from the face on camera.
63
00:04:17.200 --> 00:04:22.060
Now before we look at some pros who tend to perform works, let's take a quick
64
00:04:22.060 --> 00:04:26.810
look at an amateur and this is more consistent of what I see. This is a low
65
00:04:26.810 --> 00:04:30.040
single digit handicapper and you'll see that the club height is above the
66
00:04:30.040 --> 00:04:31.200
height of the golf ball.
67
00:04:31.200 --> 00:04:36.780
It's just getting down into the height of the golf ball stays down for a slight
68
00:04:36.780 --> 00:04:41.200
period of time and then starts to come up fairly quickly.
69
00:04:41.200 --> 00:04:45.900
So while it might be low for a period quite like that, it's nowhere near as
70
00:04:45.900 --> 00:04:50.680
long a flat spot as what we saw some of the more elite drivers of the golf ball
71
00:04:50.680 --> 00:04:52.200
demonstrating.
72
00:04:52.200 --> 00:04:56.320
So now we'll briefly look at a few of the worst ranked drivers on the tour
73
00:04:56.320 --> 00:05:00.200
right now. So this is Smiley Kaufman over on the right.
74
00:05:00.200 --> 00:05:05.570
We've got Cameron turn golly over here on the left. You'll see if we get to
75
00:05:05.570 --> 00:05:10.720
right about when the club is even with the height of the foot, you'll see that
76
00:05:10.720 --> 00:05:13.200
the bottom of the club is still higher than the height of the golf ball.
77
00:05:13.200 --> 00:05:18.190
He does get it down, but you'll see that it starts to come up pretty quickly
78
00:05:18.190 --> 00:05:23.170
compared to some of those more elite drivers who we saw in the first part of
79
00:05:23.170 --> 00:05:24.200
the video.
80
00:05:24.200 --> 00:05:30.050
As you can imagine, it's a little harder to find a really high quality video of
81
00:05:30.050 --> 00:05:38.080
the guys who tend to struggle a bit more, but here you can see just after the
82
00:05:38.080 --> 00:05:41.200
club is above the height of the golf ball.
83
00:05:41.200 --> 00:05:46.920
And then that frame, I wish we had the frame kind of even with the foot, but
84
00:05:46.920 --> 00:05:52.440
you can see that it's coming from a much more kind of almost V shape high to
85
00:05:52.440 --> 00:05:58.200
high pattern as opposed to more of that gradual changing flat to flat.
86
00:05:58.200 --> 00:06:04.120
One last example, I've got Phil Mickelson here, known for being a less accurate
87
00:06:04.120 --> 00:06:08.990
driver of the golf ball. I know everyone loves to talk about his club face
88
00:06:08.990 --> 00:06:11.200
control and the steep transition.
89
00:06:11.200 --> 00:06:15.010
I think part of that is what it does down here at the bottom. So you'll see I
90
00:06:15.010 --> 00:06:19.800
've got him flipped around to a right handed pattern. You can see club height is
91
00:06:19.800 --> 00:06:25.380
still at this point, so roughly even with the foot, the bottom of the club is
92
00:06:25.380 --> 00:06:27.200
still just above the top of the ball.
93
00:06:27.200 --> 00:06:32.020
Comes down, looks pretty good through there, but then it comes up very quickly
94
00:06:32.020 --> 00:06:36.950
before it gets to the other foot. So while there's still a flatish spot and
95
00:06:36.950 --> 00:06:41.200
when his timing is on, he's a great driver of the golf ball.
96
00:06:41.200 --> 00:06:47.520
His overall consistency puts him towards the bottom statistically in accuracy
97
00:06:47.520 --> 00:06:49.200
and performance.
98
00:06:49.200 --> 00:06:54.310
So if you're struggling with your driver, this is one of the first places I
99
00:06:54.310 --> 00:06:59.250
might look to just get the overall shape of the path of the club down at the
100
00:06:59.250 --> 00:07:00.200
bottom.
101
00:07:00.200 --> 00:07:06.690
And if you find that it has much more of a V shape or high to high pattern to
102
00:07:06.690 --> 00:07:10.350
it, that might be something you want to try to work on to improve your driving
103
00:07:10.350 --> 00:07:11.200
consistency.
Have questions about this video?
Ask Mulligan for personalized guidance on technique, drills, or how to apply what you've learned.
Ask Mulligan
Related topics
This video hasn't been assigned to any topics yet. Browse all topics in the sidebar.